Refuting the ridiculous

I first encountered the simple, terrific (and simply terrific) graphic below a few weeks ago via Slacktivist.

I thought of it again the other day when this story came out. Here’s the gist:

One reason [Michele Bachmann’s Iowa Campaign Chair, Tamara] Scott said that voters should oppose marriage equality for gay and lesbian couples is that it would open the door for polyamory and legalizing marriages between people and inanimate objects. While speaking with Bob Vander Plaats, the head of The Family Leader, Scott warned that gay rights will lead to people marrying objects like the Eiffel Tower.

To such awful, bigoted, ridiculousness, this seems the best response:

2 thoughts on “Refuting the ridiculous

Comments, questions, funny anecdotes, brushes with greatness...?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s